The Plame Game: When Denials are Not Denials and Backtracking Isn't Backtracking
Two recent developments in Project Frog-March (or is it "Frog Walk" now?). First, White House minister of propaganda Scott McClellan spun so hard on this subject that he managed to accelerate the rotation of the earth at this morning's press briefing. You can read the full version at TPM, thanks to the intrepid Josh Marshall. The short version is:
- The White House is aware of the situation
- The only action being taken is the Justice Department inquiry.
- The President is not going to ask anyone about this.
- The charge that Karl Rove was involved is "ridiculous" and McClellan knows Rove wasn't involved because they've had extensive conversations, although he never asked him about it directly.
- The President sees no need for a special counsel (too bad - Warren Christopher or Sam Nunn was waiting by the phone)
In the avalanche of verbosity that tumbled from McClellan's lips on this subject, however, notably absent was a categorical denial of White House involvement. News outlets are characterizing McClellan's statements as emphatic, which they were, and a denial, which they were not, really, if you read it right.
Also new this morning is that Joseph Wilson, the US ambassador and husband of outed agent Plame, said the following on Good Morning America.
In one speech I gave out in Seattle not too long ago, I mentioned the name Karl Rove. I think I was probably carried away by the spirit of the moment. I don't have any knowledge that Karl Rove himself was either the leaker or the authorizer of the leak. But I have great confidence that, at a minimum, he condoned it and certainly did nothing to shut it down.
Some people may be disappointed that Wilson backed off, but personally, I'm glad he said this. There's nothing in the facts of the case that would give anyone reason to believe that Wilson knew who blew Plame's cover, and rather than stick with an educated guess that may prove untrue, Wilson is clearing the air.
The only ones who really know who disclosed the confidential information are the reporters who were briefed, the criminals who conducted the briefing, and anyone they may have consulted and conspired with. Wilson's accusation of Rove is helpful in focussing attention, for sure. If Rove didn't have his hand in this, he's probably personally ready to fire whoever did for not letting him know. But Wilson's speculation doesn't contribute anything tangible to the search for the truth, which must now be conducted in a way that leaves no room for doubt, spin or charges of partisanship.
11:20:10 AM
|