Emphasis Added


September 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Aug   Oct


 

TOPICS WE DISCUSS HERE:

 

 

 

EA'S GREATEST RANTS
Art, Spectacle and Terrorism
Car Porn
Freedom is not a Handout
Livy It Up
Guard Rails and Guard Towers
The Proud Tower
Who Needs Democracy?
The Axis of Ignorance
Shadow of a Dowd
Fox on the Run
Just Another Word for Nothing Left to Lose
Tit for Tat (Rob vs. WSJ)
What Price Victory?
The First Casualty
The Guns of Baghdad
New Europe/Old Europe
Is it Even Worth Asking Bush for Reasons?
War and Peace
Amiri Baraka: Righteous Dope
My Country Right or ?
Liberal Media - Myth & Reality
Matters of Life and Death
Dockworker’s Strike
Who’s “Out of Touch,” WSJ?
Post-Election Analysis
Failures of Direct Democracy
Prison Guard Unions a Problem for Dems

 

 

 

 

Book Reviews

Plateforme by Michel Huellebecq
Guarding Hanna by Miha Mazinni
Unholy Wars by John Cooley
The Inquisition of the Middle Ages by Henry Lea
H.P. Lovecraft: An Appreciation
The Filth by Grant Morrison
I Was Seven in '75 by Ellen Forney
Supernatural Law by Batton Lash
Lies  by Al Franken
 
 
Who is Brian Duffy?

(and why is he saying these terrible things on this site?)

 

Sunday, September 28, 2003

Project Frog-March Rolls On

CalPundit has been doing some fine blogging on the Plame situation. He makes an interesting point about what makes this particular accusation far more potentially damaging to the Bushies than largely partisan and policy fights over Iraq, taxes, lies and spin:

...this isn't just normal partisan sniping. This is serious stuff, and loyalty to George Bush shouldn't prevent anyone from saying so. From a bunch of folks who have been bleating about moral clarity for over a year, that's the least we can expect.

Indeed. Honest folks can disagree about whether going into Iraq was a good thing, regardless of the confused and largely untrue set of reasons given by the Administration. However, I don't think you will find many Americans eager to defend the principle that it's okay to abuse executive power to intimidate critics, or to endanger American security by disclosing confidential information for political purposes.


4:45:38 PM    Emphasize This! []

Just One More Thing, Dr. Rice...

I'm slightly suprised that the questioners on the morning talk shows didn't take the next logical step when they had Condi Rice in the dock. "So Dr. Rice, did you personally have anything to do with the alleged press briefing?" Make her deny it in public, since only a categorical denial would suffice to a direct question like that.

Oh, but wait, she was on Fox and Meet the Press. Sorry, I thought there were real reporters involved.


4:32:46 PM    Emphasize This! []

High Crimes and Dirty Tricks

When people think of Nixon scandals, they naturally think of Watergate. But the mushrooming case of Joseph Wilson and his CIA-agent wife reminds me more of the matter of Daniel Ellsberg. Ellsberg was a senior Pentagon analyst who produced a detailed study on the history of US involvement in Vietnam, and later leaked it to the New York Times as the famous "Pentagon Papers." Enraged, Nixon's political team burgled the offices of Ellsberg's psychologist in an effort to find information that could discredit and embarrass Ellsberg, and punish him for releasing actual facts that undermined Nixon’s lies about the situation in Vietnam.

 

Commenter Matthew DeLuca is right that it’s premature to assume that this incident will become a “cancer at the heart of the Presidency” as Watergate was. Certainly the crime of using government power against a private citizen for political purposes is the same. But the difference here is that Bush has the opportunity to do what Nixon did not: cut out the rot before it spreads, and refuse to protect criminals inside his Administration even though they were acting on his behalf.

 

The problem is, there is already speculation on the part of the public as to the identities of the two “senior White House officials” who unambiguously broke the law in this matter. There is also apparently a source inside the White House who has confirmed and clarified the story to the Washington Post. If someone like Karl Rove and/or Condi Rice was involved in the press briefing that blew Palme’s cover, then the surgery to remove the “cancer” – throwing over the top political strategist and the top national security strategist – may be almost as harmful to the prospects of the Administration as a protracted scandal of cover-ups and denials.

 

Apparently the unflappable Dr. Rice was a quivering nervous wreck on her appearances on Fox and Meet the Press this morning. If she has anything personally to do with this matter, she has reason to worry. We are past the point of denials now. It is beyond dispute that a CIA asset was compromised when Novak disclosed classified material in his July 14 column. Novak himself maintains that he got the information from Administration sources. It’s too late to try to blame the CIA, Wilson and his wife, or Novak himself, because too many people have already gone on record as saying that the briefing took place, and that “Senior White House officials” were involved. This is not just an ethical violation. It is clearly against the law, and the CIA has shown no sense of humor in its desire to see the perpetrators punished.

 

Furthermore, at least six reporters and an independent source inside the White House know who gave the briefing. Without a doubt, the President also knows, or could find out. There is no plausible reason why the White House should not disclose their identities immediately and demand their resignations. Any delay or equivocation in this regard invites charges of a cover-up, and any further assistance given to the perpetrators in evading justice potentially makes the White House party to a criminal conspiracy.

 

Currently there is no evidence to suggest that the President himself had anything to do with this. Mr. Bush deserves the presumption of innocence (as well as ignorance, which he is always entitled to), but he needs to be immediately and clearly forthcoming about what happened, who did it, why and what the consequences will be. Given the President’s temperamental difficulties with facing up to errors and the culture of loyalty pervading this White House, there are grounds to suspect things will get worse before they get better.

 

There remains an opportunity for the system to work here. It will be interesting to see if President Bush will be willing to pay the high price to ensure that the law is upheld and national security concerns take precedence over political dirty tricks.

 

Update:

New MSNBC post updating the story here.

Fellow Salon Bloggers Rayne, Different Strings and the Agora have initiated Project Frog March to keep this meme building momentum until we get some answers.


1:23:38 PM    Emphasize This! []

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Rob Salkowitz.
Last update: 9/27/2004; 5:36:45 PM.
Emphasis Added Theme designed by Andrew Lueck and Rob Salkowitz.

 

GUILT BY ASSOCIATION
Rayne Today
Secular Blasphemy
Different Strings
Pesky the Rat
Why Your Wife Won't Have Sex
How to Save the World
Fried Green Al Qaedas
Rich Pure and Simple (Minded)
Patriotically Incorrect
Filtchyboy
Miss Feva
Catnmus
Dave Cullen
Dick Jones Patteran Pages
FIONA
Reflections
The Barbaric Yawp
Real Live Preacher
Andrew Bayer
Blog Baby
Ken Dow
Paulapalooza
No Code
Radio Free Blogistan
Daihatsu Graceland
World O'Crap
Dr. Omed
Al Hedstrom
Paul Andrews
 
 
METABLOG:
Virtual Occuquan
 

POLITICS

Buzzflash
Josh Marshall
Ruy Teixeira
Daily Kos
Atrios
CalPundit
Mark Kleinman
Steve Gilliard
Billmon
Liberal Oasis
The Left Coaster
Oliver Willis
Ernie the Attorney
South Knox Bubba
Ken Layne
Sadly, No
Nathan Newman
Interesting Times
USS Clueless
Juan Cole
Matt Yglesias
Taegan Goddard
Happy Carpenter
 
MEDIAWATCH
Eric Alterman
Daily Howler
Mediawhores
Busy Busy Busy
Cursor
 
IDEAS
Christopher Hitchens
Paul Krugman
Arts and Letters Daily
Orcinus
New Republic
 
NEWS 'n VIEWS
The Economist
New York Times
Slate
The Nation
Reason
Washington Monthly
WSJ Opinion Journal
National Review
AlterNet
IndyMedia
Guardian UK
Seattle P-I
Seattle Times
Stateline
The Hill
The Agonist
 
FICTION
Neil Gaiman
William Gibson
Scala House Press
Harlan Ellison
Warren Ellis
Arkham House
Peter David
Grant Morrison
 
 

 

OBSESSIONS
Min's Dragnet Records
USS Mariner
Baseball Prospectus
ComiCon.com
TalkLeft
FilmThreat
The Stranger
 
 
 

 

Ads 'n Ends


 



Site Meter

Blogroll Me!


Proud to be a member of BlogSnob!

Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst help?


Is my Blog HOT or NOT?

Click here to visit Blogster.Net - Top Blogs!

< £ Salon Bloggers & >




Subscribe to "Emphasis Added" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.