Emphasis Added


February 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28  
Jan   Mar


 

TOPICS WE DISCUSS HERE:

 

 

 

EA'S GREATEST RANTS
Art, Spectacle and Terrorism
Car Porn
Freedom is not a Handout
Livy It Up
Guard Rails and Guard Towers
The Proud Tower
Who Needs Democracy?
The Axis of Ignorance
Shadow of a Dowd
Fox on the Run
Just Another Word for Nothing Left to Lose
Tit for Tat (Rob vs. WSJ)
What Price Victory?
The First Casualty
The Guns of Baghdad
New Europe/Old Europe
Is it Even Worth Asking Bush for Reasons?
War and Peace
Amiri Baraka: Righteous Dope
My Country Right or ?
Liberal Media - Myth & Reality
Matters of Life and Death
Dockworker’s Strike
Who’s “Out of Touch,” WSJ?
Post-Election Analysis
Failures of Direct Democracy
Prison Guard Unions a Problem for Dems

 

 

 

 

Book Reviews

Plateforme by Michel Huellebecq
Guarding Hanna by Miha Mazinni
Unholy Wars by John Cooley
The Inquisition of the Middle Ages by Henry Lea
H.P. Lovecraft: An Appreciation
The Filth by Grant Morrison
I Was Seven in '75 by Ellen Forney
Supernatural Law by Batton Lash
Lies  by Al Franken
 
 
Who is Brian Duffy?

(and why is he saying these terrible things on this site?)

 

Thursday, February 27, 2003

War is Me…

 

Since I’ve been more form than content the last couple of days, I thought I’d lead off the new-look blog with a doozie. As I indicated in my post on Monday, I’m not really excited about the prospect of war, but I no longer see any alternative. In a triumph of single-minded stubbornness not seen since the days of Lyndon Johnson, Mr. Bush and company pointed the car toward the cliff, put it in gear, gunned the motor, and then placed Saddam Hussein’s hand on the emergency break. Well, says our Prez, it’s up to him to stop it, never mind who started the situation moving in this awful direction.

 

Whatever the outcome of the next few weeks’ deliberations, Bush and company won the battle when the Security Council voted for 1441 in November. That’s because they sold the UN on the fundamental premise that an Iraq that was in any way not compliant with the 12-year old armistice agreement posed an unacceptable threat to the region, the US and the world. The US victory was in narrowing the issue to the purely technical question of disarmament, rather than the larger matter of regional stability or whether imposing complete disarmament on a reluctant and largely suppine Iraq was really the best course of action. However, once the vote was taken, even though it favored inspections before military options, the issue became strictly one of Iraqi compliance, not US intentions.

 

Unfortunately for those of us who hoped for a peaceful outcome, that was a sucker bet. Saddam is proud, ambitious, sneaky and, based on the evidence, an exceptionally poor judge of his own position. Although the reported violations so far are mostly minor, they appear to be systematic and deliberate (and even if they aren’t, who among us will stand up and vouch for Saddam’s good faith?). Furthermore, in his attempt earlier this week to challenge the validity of the inspectors’ findings and his initial refusal to destroy the Al-Sammud missile system, Saddam pulled the rug entirely out from under the idea of inspections. Even if he reconsiders his position, as it appears he might, he has demonstrated the fatal flaw of the inspection process and left anyone who pinned hopes for peace on vigorous, continuous inspections without a pot to piss in. After all, if inspections are not guaranteed to be immediately productive of full disarmament, what is their purpose?

 

Since the UN accepted (albeit begrudgingly) Bush’s premise that disarmament - rather than pacification -  of Iraq was the only acceptable outcome, it now, in my view, has no choice but to authorize the use of force. Otherwise, it fatally compromises its credibility – and not just because Bush and company say so. You simply can’t have a unanimous vote for 1441, and three months later, in the face of a challenge to the authority of the inspectors – even in the form of a hollow, face-saving gesture of disrespect – fail to act. That’s the very definition of irrelevance and irresolution, and it would effectively destroy the ability of the UN to act decisively in any future confrontation.

 

Let me be clear. I think the drive to war is a foolish policy to have embarked on, and that the war itself will be tragic, costly and ultimately counter-productive to American interests. But as a course of action resulting from the logic of international diplomacy, it is now inevitable. Bush successfully manipulated the situation by making Saddam, rather than irrational American aggression or regional security, the issue last fall. France, Russia, Germany and the others took the bait, and now, in the face of Saddam's clear effort and ongoing intentions to evade and undermine the inspections, it’s too late to reopen that argument. The UN will be necessary to assist in the aftermath, adjudicate the many extremely thorny problems and costs that will result, and serve as a long-term counterweight to American ambitions. Give Bush his war, since it appears nothing will stop him anyway. But don’t give him the victory he wants – the total defeat and humiliation of the UN, and the discredit of internationalism for a generation.


9:20:51 PM    Emphasize This! []

Tech Help!

Can anyone tell me why my category pages aren't posting in the new template?


9:20:23 PM    Emphasize This! []

test- still messing with the template
8:28:46 AM    Emphasize This! []

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Rob Salkowitz.
Last update: 9/27/2004; 5:21:10 PM.
Emphasis Added Theme designed by Andrew Lueck and Rob Salkowitz.

 

GUILT BY ASSOCIATION
Rayne Today
Secular Blasphemy
Different Strings
Pesky the Rat
Why Your Wife Won't Have Sex
How to Save the World
Fried Green Al Qaedas
Rich Pure and Simple (Minded)
Patriotically Incorrect
Filtchyboy
Miss Feva
Catnmus
Dave Cullen
Dick Jones Patteran Pages
FIONA
Reflections
The Barbaric Yawp
Real Live Preacher
Andrew Bayer
Blog Baby
Ken Dow
Paulapalooza
No Code
Radio Free Blogistan
Daihatsu Graceland
World O'Crap
Dr. Omed
Al Hedstrom
Paul Andrews
 
 
METABLOG:
Virtual Occuquan
 

POLITICS

Buzzflash
Josh Marshall
Ruy Teixeira
Daily Kos
Atrios
CalPundit
Mark Kleinman
Steve Gilliard
Billmon
Liberal Oasis
The Left Coaster
Oliver Willis
Ernie the Attorney
South Knox Bubba
Ken Layne
Sadly, No
Nathan Newman
Interesting Times
USS Clueless
Juan Cole
Matt Yglesias
Taegan Goddard
Happy Carpenter
 
MEDIAWATCH
Eric Alterman
Daily Howler
Mediawhores
Busy Busy Busy
Cursor
 
IDEAS
Christopher Hitchens
Paul Krugman
Arts and Letters Daily
Orcinus
New Republic
 
NEWS 'n VIEWS
The Economist
New York Times
Slate
The Nation
Reason
Washington Monthly
WSJ Opinion Journal
National Review
AlterNet
IndyMedia
Guardian UK
Seattle P-I
Seattle Times
Stateline
The Hill
The Agonist
 
FICTION
Neil Gaiman
William Gibson
Scala House Press
Harlan Ellison
Warren Ellis
Arkham House
Peter David
Grant Morrison
 
 

 

OBSESSIONS
Min's Dragnet Records
USS Mariner
Baseball Prospectus
ComiCon.com
TalkLeft
FilmThreat
The Stranger
 
 
 

 

Ads 'n Ends


 



Site Meter

Blogroll Me!


Proud to be a member of BlogSnob!

Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst help?


Is my Blog HOT or NOT?

Click here to visit Blogster.Net - Top Blogs!

< £ Salon Bloggers & >




Subscribe to "Emphasis Added" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.